A few good reasons to consider Linux expressed in the discussion about Munich’s IT Lead: ‘No Compelling Reason’ To Switch Back To Windows From Linux.
You probably heard the news that any computer device can be hacked. It is now officially confirmed that tools exist to break the security of any computer and mobile device connected to the Internet. I’ve said things like that on this blog in the past. Now, there is genuine confirmation of my observations.
What does this mean? A few things.
- About 90% of the people don’t care if they are spied on because there is no obvious harm.
- People who do care don’t have convenient options.
- Anyone exchanging money, social security #’s, photo id #’s, or sensitive conversations over anything Internet based are making a mistake.
- The web is for public data. Encryption is useful, for minimizing website defacement, casual peeping, but it is not really a secure way to lock down data permanently.
- Session Highjacking is rampant. In many places, people are nearby doing illegal unofficial wiretapping all over the place. It is the new side gig to sell you out, keep tabs on you, or tap into your computer and online storage accounts to see what kind of files you got.
- Targeted denial of service to block certain online activities for reasons ranging from the arbitrary to sophisticated remote puppetry and observation of your reactions. Sometimes, your ISP isn’t at fault when your use of an online service doesn’t work right. It may be an actual remote operator giving you a difficult time.
I’ve observed these things for years. Finally, there is proof for the basis of my claims for the last 10 years. What do you do about all this?
- You could stop using the Internet and mobile technology.
- Go back to flip phones.
- Use the physical post office.
- Only use social media and email for things you don’t mind being public and avoid eCommerce, eBanking, and e-anything that could turn into identity highjacking or general personal compromise.
- Only use Apple computers. Nothing is guaranteed safe, but their technology mindset goes to the furthest extent, and they seem to put the most effort into security that is not for show. Unfortunately, Apple is not an option for everyone.
- Hope the tech industry enters into a hardware renaissance regarding better hardware that is more resilient to backdoors.
- Mentally resist online manipulation. Do not be afraid of being watched. Use these technologies as the public tools they are and not under the expectation of privacy.
Lack of disclosure of a security breach or absence of evidence of a breach are not evidence that a breach did not occur. Big companies exist who have never publicly disclosed they have been breached and that any information, transaction or data you’ve shared with them has been leaked out to third parties. I’ve studied reports about Malware and Spyware enough to say that the nature of those tools are such that likely just about everybody and everything has been breached who is or has been connected to the Internet.
In the future, some of the most sought out people will be those who have the least history or footprint of any kind on the Internet. With all I have stated, I still see value in the Internet and the Web, particularly for research, looking up things, and matters that can be out in the open. Primarily on point # 4 in both sets of bulleted points presented earlier.
A good description of the ebbs and flows of a career in software development by a 30+ year veteran of software development. See: Is software development really a dead-end job after 35-40? by Kurt Guntheroth. Note that exceptions do exist but may be rare.
Unless you totally give up on document formatting compatibility. The work around for LibreOffice is to distributr read-only versions of documents as PDF since PDF generally preserves the original look of documents. Also see on Quora:
Why doesn’t anyone compete with Microsoft and create a new, better Microsoft office suite? by Ed Horch.
Andrei Ion Rînea had a good response on Quora about Unpopular Opinions in Software Development. He succinctly states why he thinks ORMs are bad. I fully agree with his statements. Tools like Entity Framework, ADO.NET Typed DataSets, and other tools of their kind work well for small software development projects that will always have small data involved. If the data the program must process or the structure of a database expands in a significant way to use more of the tools in a database, these ORM tools start to fall apart. Either, they can’t handle large volumes of data as well as a hand-tuned design using hand-tuned software code can with hand-tuned SQL. Or, they can’t represent the full capabilities of a database the way you can if you hand-wrote the integration between a program, data inputs/outputs, and a database.
Good ORMs do exist. A really good one is Dapper by the creators of StackOverflow. The StackOverflow website handles roughly 1 to 5 million database-driven web-page access a day. This is from hundreds of thousands of people accessing the website at the same time. Potentially accessing the database at the same time. Even the smallest drop in efficiency multiplied by the number of accesses could have a huge impact. StackOverflow did not take any chances with the way they wrote data access code. StackOverflow opted out of the standard Microsoft tools similar to Entity Framework and now use their own. They produced something simpler, more streamlined, and more efficient and is a case study in sometimes going the custom route.
You’ll notice from this GitHub screenshot from the Dapper page, the relative efficiency of doing your own data access code versus an easy to use out-of-the-box solution. Notice that hand coded beats everything. Dapper, which is a close automation of hand-coded code is very close. If you don’t want to hand code but you want to avoid the overhead and other problems of Entity Framework, Dapper is a good choice. In general, doing your own thing or using a methodology like what they did in making Dapper is often a better choice for scalability and getting full access to the database’s capabilities.
Small update. The base class, InteractiveDisplay.hxx, was updated to keep the public definitions, but with the virtual specifier removed. Private methods with the same name and signature as the public methods where introduced adding the Impl suffix to the name. Those private methods were then made virtual. Derived classes then override those private methods. I find this to be a stylistic preference advocated by experts and I decided to try it out. You can read about private virtual functions here.
The actual code update visual graph is here.